Course syllabus

PHI 221, Ethical Problems                                                   Spring 2013
Prof. Ashley U. Vaught                                                          Email: prof.vaught@gmail.com
T 5:30-8:30 p.m.                                                                     Office hours: 5-5:30 and by appt.
West Regional Center 136                                                      Office: WRC 135C

Course Description
In this course we will examine several basic ethical theories in relation to a host of abiding ethical issues. We will be reading the major texts of virtue ethics, deontology, and utilitarianism. In concert, we will be discussing euthanasia, body dysmorphia, friendship, human rights, and other issues.

Student Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of this course students will be able to:
• Explain the basic philosophical problems that shape ethical discourse;
• Analyze a philosophical text for key concepts and/or arguments; and
• Critique an ethical argument orally and in writing.

Course Requirements
1) Reading: you must do 15-40 pages of reading each week.  Philosophical books and essays can be difficult to read and understand, requiring much more concentration and attention than the newspaper or a novel.  Taking notes while reading is recommended.  
2) Attendance and participation: attendance is mandatory and will be recorded.  More than two absences (excused or otherwise) will negatively affect your final grade.  Although the course shall generally assume a lecture format, you are expected to participate by asking questions during the lecture or contributing to discussion if a question is raised.
3) Argument outlines, essays and examinations: you must write one argument outline and two essays (3 pages); one examination will be given. Students will select a conclusion in consultation with the professor for the argument outline. For each essay assignment, students are free to choose from several topics.  The final examination will be cumulative.

Grade Composition
25%  Weekly Reading Quizzes (3 multiple choice questions)
15%  Argument outline (on blog)
15%  Blog comments
10%  First essay (3 pages)
15%  Second essay (3 pages)
15%  Final examination (multiple choice)
5%    Attendance/participation

Required Texts
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co, 1985. ISBN: 9780872204645.
Immanuel Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. James Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1993.  ISBN: 0872201678)
J.S. Mill. Utilitarianism. Edited by George Sher. 2nd ed. Hackett Publishing Co., 2002. ISBN: 087220605X.

(available as PDFs on Canvas)
Lawrence A. Blum, “Personal Relationships”
Ann Davis, “Contemporary Deontology”
Alan Donagan, “Respect for Persons”
Phillipa Foot, “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”
Margaret Olivia Little, “Abortion”
Robert Louden, “On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics”
Bernard Mayo, “Virtue and Moral Theory”
Gerald McKenny, “Enhancements and the Ethical Significance of Vulnerability”
Thomas Nagel, “War and Massacre”
Alastair Norcross, “Killing and Letting Die”
James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia”
Peter Singer, “Utilitarianism and Vegetarianism”
Singer, “Equality and its Implications”
Patricia Smith, “Bad Samaritans, Acts and Omissions”
Jeremy Waldron, “Property Rights and Welfare Distribution”

Course Blog:
http://phi221spr13.blogspot.com

Violations of Academic Integrity
All students are expected to know what constitutes a violation of academic integrity, which is found in the Undergraduate Student Handbook.

Schedule of classes



January 15
Introduction to the course; making arguments
22
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Books I:1-2,4-5,8-9,12, II:1-4,6-9; Mayo, “Virtue and Moral Theory”
29
Nicomachean Ethics, Books III:5-12, VII:1-10; McKenny, “Enhancements and Ethical Significance of Vulnerability”
February 5
Nicomachean Ethics, Bks. VIII:11-14, X:1-5;
12
Nicomachean Ethics, Books VIII:1-8,12-13, IX:3-4,8-9; Lawrence Blum, “Personal Relationships”
19
Nicomachean Ethics, Books V; Waldron, “Property Rights and Welfare Distribution”; First essay assigned
26
Smith, “Bad Samaritans, Acts and Omissions”; Louden, “On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics”
March 5
Spring Break—Class cancelled
12
Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Preface, First Section; Davis, “Contemporary Deontology”; Margaret Olivia Little, “Abortion”; First essay due
19
Grounding …, Second Section; Davis, “Contemporary Deontology”
26
Grounding …, Second Section; Norcross, “Killing and Letting Die”
April 2
Grounding, “On the Supposed Right to Lie”; Foot, “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”; Second essay assigned
9
Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapters 1, 2; Singer, “Equality and its Implications”
16
Utilitarianism, Chapter 3; Singer, “Vegetarianism and Utilitarianism”
23
Utilitarianism, Appendix; Nagel, “War and Massacre”; Second essay due
30
Final Examination












-->

1 comment:

  1. This is a brief essay on Conduct and Character

    Good morning, good evening, excuse me, thank you, please etc. were words I could not forget to say as a child growing up. The word "Conduct and Character" were two of my watch words and both governed my my general behavior then and now. Thanks to good parenting.
    Conduct and Character are closely knitted together and somewhat difficult to to point out at times. Conduct is the state of one's behavior,whereas character refers to the general deportment or behavior of an individual.
    According to articledashboard.com,conduct is what we perform and Character is who we are and how we behave. Charater is the root of the tree,conduct, is the fruit it bears.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.